A Wireless Mesh Opportunistic Network Routing Algorithm Based on Trust Relationships
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To solve the problem of low message delivery rate and high network resource consumption when forwarding messages in opportunistic networks, an opportunistic routing algorithm based on trust relationships for wireless mesh networks is proposed.Firstly, the wireless mesh network is analyzed and the opportunistic routing model is constructed; By analyzing the security mechanism and security threat of communication entities, then measuring the trust degree of links and nodes, establishing the trust relationship between nodes, and defining and quantifying a new security measurement method based on the trust model; Finally, according to the security measurement method defined by the model, select the node with high trust value to participate in the message forwarding process.At the same time, give priority to the node with greater trust with the destination node as the relay node, and allocate the message copy according to the trust degree to make the message pass along the direction of increasing trust, to complete the design of opportunistic routing algorithm in wireless mesh networks.Experimental results show that the routing algorithm can effectively improve the message delivery rate, up to about 95%, and reduce the consumption of network resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".