Project Tutok 3Rs (Reading, Writing, Arithmetic) in Maybancal Elementary School
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate and determine the effectiveness of Project Tutok 3Rs (Reading, Writing, Arithmetic) in improving the performance of grade 4 learners and teacher's perception in Maybancal Elementary School and SPED Center. This study used quantitative types of research to determine the performance of the learners after the implementation of intervention and tested the significant difference before and after the implementation. This is also a 1ualitative type of research for this determined the perception of the learners after the implementation of intervention and had tested the significant difference on the perception before and after the implementation. The respondents of the study were the Grade 4 learners in Maybancal Elementary School and Sped Center. The study was conducted during the Third Quarter of the school year 2021-2022. Tracking the findings, based from the result on Mean and Paired Sample T-test, the study found that Project Tutok 3Rs increased the performance of the learners where the mean percentage of 82% increased to 90%. It was concluded that in Maybancal Elementary School, Project Tutok 3Rs has a great impact in the improvement of learner's performances in the school.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".