THE GENERA OF DIAPRIINAE (HYMENOPTERA: DIAPRIIDAE) IN THE NEW WORLD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subfamily Diapriinae (Diapriidae: Proctotrupoidea) in the New World is reviewed at the supra specific level. Three tribes and 52 genera are recognized. Sixteen new genera are proposed: Apopria (Diapriini), Avoca (Diapriini), Chilomicrus (Spilomicrini), Cruzium (Diapriini), Doddius (Spilomicrini), Eladio (Diapriini), Epomium (Spilomicrini), Ferrugenus (Spilomicrini), Hansona (Diapriini), Leucopria (Diapriini), Mimopriella (Diapriini), Omopria (Diapriini), Ortona (Psilini), Peckidium (incertae sedis) Psychopria (Diapriini), and Turripria (Diapriini). The following new species are described: Apopria coveri ♀ (USA), Asolenopsia gibba ♀ (Costa Rica), Avoca collaris ♀ (USA), Chilomicrus pecki ♂ (Chile), Cruzium amphorale ♀ (Costa Rica), Eladio cruzi ♀ (Costa Rica), Epomium cicatrix ♀ (Chile), Ferrugenus chilensis ♀ (Chile), Hansona pauli ♀ (Costa Rica), Leucopria cylindricornis ♀ (Ecuador, Costa Rica), Omopria brevipalpis ♀ (Brazil), Ortona hansoni ♀ (Costa Rica), Peckidium enigmaticum ♀ (Antilles, Central and South America, West Africa, Philippines), Psychopria hoguei ♂ (Costa Rica), Turripria woldai ♀ (Panama). New generic synonymies are proposed: Acanthopria Ashmead (=Adelioneiva Fischer), Asolenopria Kieffer (=Euplacopria Ferrière), Bruchopria Kieffer (=Aulatopria Brèthes), Doliopria Kieffer (=Martinica Risbec), Megaplastopria Ashmead (=Xyalopria Kieffer), Notoxoides Ashmead (=Psilogasteroides Brèthes), Pentapria Kieffer (=Antipapria Fabritius, Bakeria Kieffer, Plutopria Kieffer, Spilomicrinus Ogloblin), Spilomicrus Westwood (=Hoplopria Ashmead, Linkiola Kieffer) , Szelenyiopria Fabritius (=Gymnopria Loiácono). New combinations are proposed: Aulatopria tucumana Brèthes to Bruchopria, Bakeria rugosa Dodd to Doddius, Gymnopria lucens Loiacono to Szelenyiopria, Mimopria pentatoma Borgmeier and Mimopria splendens Borgmeier to Mimopriella, and Xanthopria nitida Brues to Acanthopria. The 52 genera are keyed (keys in both English and Spanish); for each genus the synonymies, diagnoses, descriptions, recognition and relationships, distribution, and biology are given. Twelve plates with 107 figures are included.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".