MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6958107557 · doi:10.6068/dp1718f690d6f54

TREND: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Main Economic Indicators (MEI): Prices - Purchasing Power Parities for GDP and Related Indicators | Country: China, India | Indicator: Purchasing Power Parities for GDP - Purchasing Power Parities for GDP - Comparative Price Levels, 1997 - 2018. Data Planet™ Statistical Datasets: A SAGE Publishing Resource Dataset-ID: 062-003-022

2020· other· en· W6958107557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Planet · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurchasing powerCurrencyEconomic indicatorPurchasing power parityPrice indexGDP deflatorPer capitaPurchasingNational accounts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Main Economic Indicators (MEI): Prices - Purchasing Power Parities for GDP and Related Indicators | Country: China, India | Indicator: Purchasing Power Parities for GDP - Purchasing Power Parities for GDP - Comparative Price Levels, 1997 - 2018. Data Planet™ Statistical Datasets: A SAGE Publishing Resource Dataset-ID: 062-003-022 Dataset: This subset of the Main Economic Indicators (MEI) database contains Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs), which represent rates of currency conversion that eliminate the differences in price levels between countries. Per capita volume indices based on PPP converted data reflect only differences in the volume of goods and services produced. Comparative price levels are defined as the ratios of PPPs to exchange rates, providing measures of the differences in price levels between countries. The PPPs are given in national currency units per US dollar. The price levels and volume indices derived using these PPPs have been rebased on the OECD average. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Main Economic Indicators database provides comparative statistics on OECD member countries and other non-member countries. Data availability varies by nation and by time period. See the technical documentation for information on national practices related to the compilation of data. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org.libproxy1.usc.edu/economics/data/main-economic-indicators_mei-data-en Category: Prices, Consumption, and Cost of Living, International Relations and Trade Subject: Consumer Prices, Purchasing Power, Price Indexes Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Established in 1961, when 18 European countries plus the United States and Canada joined together to create an organization dedicated to global development, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) today includes 34 member countries from around the globe, ranging from North and South America to Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Member countries include many of the world’s advanced countries as well as emerging nations. The OECD mission remains the promotion of policies that will improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world. The OECD collects and analyzes data on a broad range of topics to help governments foster prosperity and fight poverty through economic growth and financial stability, at the same time taking the environmental implications of economic and social development into account. The OECD Secretariat collects and analyzes data, after which committees discuss policy regarding this information, the Council makes decisions, and then governments implement recommendations. The performance of individual countries is monitored following implementation via a system of multilateral surveillance and a peer review process. The OECD is headquartered in Paris, France, and it is funded by its member countries. National contributions are based on a formula that takes account of the size of each member's economy. The largest contributor is the United States, which provides nearly 24% of the budget, followed by Japan. http://www.oecd.org.libproxy1.usc.edu/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.025
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.137

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Planet→French-language works237,207→