MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Review of till geochemistry and indicator mineral methods for mineral exploration in glaciated terrain

2023· article· en· W6958199333 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlluviumTerrainSedimentBeach morphodynamicsErosionPlateau (mathematics)Mineral explorationArctic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Appendix 5-Photo 1. Photograph of mountainous terrain in Fraser Plateau of south-central British Columbia, in western Canada. In this type of terrain, till can be sampled at higher elevations from thin till veneers (Tv) and thicker till blankets (Tb) on valley walls and from thick sediment sequences in valleys filled with till and alluvium (A), using overburden drilling. Appendix 5-Photo 2. Oblique photo showing an area affected by marine incursion near Baker Lake in Arctic Canada. The thick black dashed line indicates the inland limit of marine incursion. Till unmodified by wave action can be collected above this limit (west side of photo). Till surfaces topographically lower than this limit may be significantly reworked and winnowed by waves and be overlain by a bouldery mantle or beach shingles of poorly sorted debris (washed till). Raised beach sediments derived from winnowed till are not suitable sample sites because of significant reworking of till and significant transport distances of sediment in longshore currents. To the right side of the photo, where glaciomarine sediments are thick, till samples must be collected from beneath the cover sediments by digging holes or using deeper till sampling methods. Appendix 5-Photo 3. Oblique photo showing an area affected by glaciomarine incursion within the boreal forest near Gillam in central Canada. The white dashed line indicates the limit of glaciomarine incursion. Till unmodified by wave action can be collected above this limit (west side of photo). Till surfaces topographically lower than the marine limit may be significantly reworked and wave-washed and be overlain by a bouldery mantle, or beach shingles of poorly sorted debris (washed till). To the right side of the photo, where glaciomarine sediments are thick, till samples must be collected from beneath the sediments by digging holes or using other deeper till sampling methods. Photo by Michelle Gauthier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→