Intención de los estudiantes de la universidad icesi hacia la creación de empresa1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo presenta y analiza los resultados, para Colombia, de una investigación realizada entre los investigadores Gasse y Tremblay (2009) de la Universidad de Laval (Canadá) y profesores de la Universidad Icesi (Colombia), en donde se estudiaron muestras para Canadá, Francia, Túnez y Colombia. Para el caso colombiano se analizaron las percepciones de estudiantes de cursos obligatorios y electivos sobre Espíritu Empresarial (Entrepreneurship) en la Universidad Icesi durante el primer semestre de 2009. Los resultados permiten evaluar los comportamientos de los estudiantes en relación con el proceso empresarial y se derivan de allí conclusiones relacionadas con el proceso formativo implementado en la Universidad Icesi. This article presents and analyzes the results, for Colombia, of a cross-cultural research study of entrepreneurial intentions conducted between Gasse and Tremblay (2009) at the University of Laval in Canadá and professors at Icesi University, based on a review of samples of students from Canadá, France, Tunisia, and Colombia. In the case of Colombia, a review was conducted of the perceptions, valúes, and attitudes of undergraduate students taking mandatory and elective Entrepreneurship courses at Icesi University in the first semester of 2009. The results make it possible to evalúate the students' behaviors in relation to the entrepreneurial process and provide the basis of conclusions relative to the educational process implemented at Icesi University. Este artigo apresenta e analisa os resultados, para a Colômbia, de uma investigação realizada entre os investigadores Gasse e Tremblay (2009) da Universidade de Laval (Canadá) e professores da Universidade Icesi (Colômbia), em que foram estudadas amostras para o Canadá, França, Tunísia e Colômbia. Para o caso colombiano, se analisaram as percepções de estudantes de cursos obrigatórios e eletivas sobre Empreendedorismo (Entrepreneurship) na Universidade Icesi durante o primeiro semestre de 2009. Os resul-tados permitem avaliar os comportamentos dos estudantes relativamente ao processo empresarial e daí se retiram conclusões relacionadas com o processo formativo implementado na Universidade Icesi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".