Additional file 1 of Risk assessment of labial bone perforation in the anterior mandibular region: a virtual immediate implant placement study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Supplemental Figure 1 (A) The flowchart of subject and image recruitment protocol. Subjects for full edentulous ridge, dental misalignment, alveolar bone destruction, and distorted image were excluded. (B) Images for tooth missing or implant replacement, pathologic lesion, and prosthodontic treatment were excluded. Supplemental Figure 2 (A) A schematic description of the image orientation procedure. (B) The virtual implant position was verified mesiodistally (upper panel) and buccolingually (lower left panel) from reconstructed 3-dimensional images (lower right panel). Supplemental Figure 3 Definition of labial bone perforation (LBP) in the anterior mandibular region while performing virtual immediate implant placement. (A) The perforation was defined when the virtual implant extruded out of the outline of the labial cortical bone in the cross-sectioned and axial-viewed images. (B) The non-perforation was defined as the virtual implant within the apical outline of the labial cortical bone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.773 | 0.070 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".