Additional file 3 of The fatty acid composition in follicles is related to the developmental potential of oocytes up to the blastocyst stage: a single-centre cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 3: Supplementary 1. Comparison of the proportions of specific FF FA and FA groups in free fatty acids (FFA), phospholipids (PL), cholesterol esters (CHE) and triglycerides (TG)) of the least (1st quartile, Q1) and best (4th quartile, Q4) performing quartiles, based on the assisted reproductive technology outcome parameters related to embryos developing between days 3 and 5 relative to oocytes with two pronuclei (ED3-5/2PN), expanded blastocysts on day 5 relative to oocytes with two pronuclei (EB5/2PN) and embryo utilization rate (EUR). Means or Median of parameters which show significant differences (P < 0.05) or a trend (0.05 ≤ P < 0.10) are presented in bold. Supplementary Table 2. Concentration of TFA or FA families and relative proportions of individual FF FA of normal weight, overweight and obese women. Supplementary Table 3. Concentration of TFA or FA families and relative proportions of individual FF FA in three age groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.735 | 0.048 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".