Additional file 1 of Association between exercise frequency with renal and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals at high cardiovascular risk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file1: Figure S1 Hazard ratios for doubling of serum creatinine and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) according to physical activity in patients with and without diabetes in unadjusted (right) and adjusted (left) analysis. The analyses on the right were adjusted for the variables diastolic blood pressure (DBP), baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), age, sex, body mass index, renal function, geographical region, physical activity, formal education, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, history of hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart rhythm, comedications, study and study medications. Figure S2 Cumulative incidence for the fourfold primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure worsening) (A), cardiovascular death (B), myocardial infarction (C), stroke (D) and hospitalization for heart failure worsening (E) according to physical activity level. Figure S3 Cumulative incidence for fourfold primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure worsening) (A), cardiovascular death (B), myocardial infarction (C), stroke (D) and hospitalization for heart failure worsening (E) according to physical activity level in patients with or without diabetes. Figure S4 Hazard ratios for the fourfold primary endpoint (A, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure worsening) and cardiovascular death (B) in patients with or without diabetes according to physical activity in unadjusted (left) and adjusted (right) analysis. The analyses on the right were adjusted for the variables diastolic blood pressure (DBP), baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), age, sex, body mass index, renal function, geographical region, physical activity, formal education, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, history of hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart rhythm, comedications, study and study medications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.812 | 0.080 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".