Data from the Phase II trial of intermittent androgen suppression for men in biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer by Bruchovsky et al (2006).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The data from the Phase II study by Bruchovsky et al on intermittent androgen deprivation therapy are publicly available at: http://www.nicholasbruchovsky.com/clinicalResearch.htmlThis figshare entry is purely for record keeping. We emphasize that we do not hold ownership of these data, and that all questions about their collection and use should be directed towards the original study team.<br>Details on the study can be found in the following publications:<br>- Bruchovsky N, Klotz LH, Sadar M, Crook JM, Hoffart D, Godwin L, Warkentin M, Gleave ME, Goldenberg SL. Intermittent androgen suppression for prostate cancer: Canadian Prospective Trial and related observations. Mol Urol. 2000 Fall;4(3):191-9;discussion 201. PMID: 11062374.- Bruchovsky, N., Klotz, L., Crook, J., Malone, S., Ludgate, C., Morris, W. J., Gleave, M. E., & Goldenberg, S. L. (2006). Final results of the Canadian prospective Phase II trial of intermittent androgen suppression for men in biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: Clinical parameters. <i>Cancer</i>, <i>107</i>(2), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21989- Bruchovsky N, Klotz L, Crook J, Goldenberg SL. Locally advanced prostate cancer--biochemical results from a prospective phase II study of intermittent androgen suppression for men with evidence of prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radiotherapy. Cancer. 2007 Mar 1;109(5):858-67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22464. PMID: 17265527.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".