MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6958416695 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22674418

Distress migration: A manufactured dystopia during COVID-19 and lockdown in India

2023· article· en· W6958416695 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystopiaDistressGovernment (linguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Wage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The movement of daily wage earners and labourers has been cited in most research texts and studies as a “reverse migration” at best, or still worse, likened to the annual circular or seasonal migration seen in India. This study debunks all such theories and seeks to establish the same as distress migration caused as a result of the sudden lockdown imposed by the Indian government and the mishandling of the situation by the administration. This study is a systematic review that has researched existing studies on migration during the pandemic. Using content from news reports and selected studies it exposes the conditions before, during and after the lockdown and the mishandling of the situation on part of the administration that resulted in the massive migrant exodus. This distress migration was affected in response to the manufactured dystopia created by the sudden lockdown and other conditions during the first wave of COVID-19. It also cites data and facts to support the same. According to data estimates, in the quarter prior to the lockdown, 182 million individuals either had employment or were looking for work, and during the lockdown, 7 million people left the labour force. The study establishes that it was indeed distress migration, and not circular or reverse migration, stoked by wrong decisions of a sudden lockdown and manufactured dystopia which resulted in thousands of migrants walking back to their homes for want of any conveyance. Laws that could have been invoked to manage the situation are either defunct or were ignored. While establishing the conditions that led to this distress migration through a systematic review of several studies and also factual content drawn from news report and analysis curated from the period, the study concludes by creating a framework for the future, and suggesting policy measures such as the need for a National Draft Policy on migration, Annual Migrant Survey and a pa-India Migrant Smart Card to keep track of the movement of migrants from one state to another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicMigration and Labor Dynamics→French-language works237,207→