MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Additional file 1 of Spatial ecology of translocated American Eel (Anguilla rostrata) in a large freshwater lake

2024· article· en· W6958422243 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaySpring (device)Table (database)Diel vertical migrationAnguilla rostrataLake district

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Table S1. Transmitter specifications. Figure S1. Individual American Eel detection history for each tagging session. Figure S2. Number of eels when first detected by julian date in different areas of Lake Ontario or in the St. Lawrence River based on different migration groups and release groups. All eels released in fall (fall 2016; fall 2017 columns) leave the Bay of Quinte at roughly the same time as the beginning of migration whereas spring released eels enter eastern Lake Ontario prior to fall migration. Bars are stacked. Outmigrants = detected in the St. Lawrence River; West migrant = if it did not out migrate and was detected in western Lake Ontario; Nonmigrant = was never detected in the St. Lawrence River or western Lake Ontario. Figure S3. Cross-correlation plot showing the synchronization of the eel migration based on weekly departure times from the Bay of Quinte if migrating to the St. Lawrence River or western region of Lake Ontario when released in the fall (A) or spring (B), and weekly departure times of eels leaving the Bay of Quinte and arriving at the mouth of the St. Lawrence River for all fall (C ) or spring (D) released eels. There is a significant correlation if the bars go beyond the dotted blue lines; For fall released eels (A), the largest correlation is 0 weeks between the two groups of eels leaving the Bay of Quinte indicating the majority of eels are leaving at the same time. For spring released eels (B), the largest correlation is -12 and -13 weeks and leaving the Bay of Quinte is not well synchronized. Fall and spring released eels leaving the Bay of Quinte have the largest correlation -1 week for reaching the mouth of the St. Lawrence River (C and D); however, timing was more sporadic for spring released eels (D). Figure S4. Monthly map of total detections and number of eels detected in 2017. Figure S5. Map of the number of eels and eel detections at receivers in the west end of Lake Ontario in 2017 and 2018. Figure S6. Graphs reflecting the predicted logistic regression relationship between environmental variables (surface water temperature - panels A and B; and moon fullness - panels C and D) and probability of American Eel leaving the Bay of Quinte in the fall (panels A and C) and entering the St. Lawrence River (SLR; panels B and D).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7490.108

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species→French-language works237,207→