Additional file 1 of Sorbicillinoids hyperproduction without affecting the cellulosic enzyme production in Trichoderma reesei JNTR5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Fig. S1 The digital pictures of the T. reesei RUT-C30 and JNTR5 grown on PDA plates for 5 days. Fig. S2 The Copy numbers of gene Tr 69957 in strain JNTR5 (a) and the FPKM values of gene Tr 69957 in strain RUT-C30 and JNTR5 b. Fig. S3 Photographs taken under 302 nm UV light of the yellow pigments produced by strain JNTR5. The samples were obtained by cultivitating JNTR5 at 28 °C for 96 h with glucose as carbon source. Fig. S4 Confocal images of T. reesei RUT-C30 and JNTR5 observed by fluorescence microscopy by 10 X objective lens at Ex/Em = 488/498-563 nm. The samples were obtained by cultivitating RUT-C30 and JNTR5 at 28 °C for 48 h with glucose as carbon source. Fig. S5 The cellulase/hemicellulase activities of JNTR5. Error bars indicate SDs from three independently cultured replicates. Table S1 Primers used in this study
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.834 | 0.196 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".