Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<strong>Supplementary Figure 1. Culture positivity timeline (x-axis) of pwCF (y-axis) with at least one S. maltophilia positive sputum culture. </strong>For each pwCF, the black line represents the time the patient attended the Southern Alberta Adult CF Clinic. Empty grey circles represent S. maltophilia negative sputum cultures, while filled black circles represent positive cultures. The row of colored triangles immediately underneath the black line represents isolates typed by PFGE and whether the recovered pulsotype was the first (blue), second (red), third (green), or fourth (yellow) distinct pulsotype recovered in each individual patient. These colors have no meaning between pwCF. The row of colored shapes immediately above the black line represents isolates typed by WGS and their MLST sequence types. Isolates with the same sequence types will have the same color/shape combination, and this is consistent between pwCF. PwCF marked with an asterisk (*) are those for whom no cultures were typed by PFGE (or WGS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.987 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it