MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6958468776 · doi:10.60825/48df-9p36

The gulf R package: quality assurance and quality control of presence, abundance and biomass indices derived from the annual September ecosystem survey of the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (1971-2021)

2025· report· en· W6958468776 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries and Oceans Canada / Pêches et Océans Canada - Publications · 2025
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbundance (ecology)Biomass (ecology)EcosystemQuality assuranceBespokeSoftware packageQuality (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-series of presence, catch abundance and catch biomass were computed for 90 taxa using data from the annual September ecosystem survey conducted in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Time-series were first computed using a legacy script written in SAS, and compared to corresponding time-series computed in the R programming language using a bespoke package called gulf. Time-series computed by the two software platforms were compared by plotting them and computing correlation coefficents. After performing a number of database corrections and developing appropriate functions, the gulf package successfully reproduced the results obtained by the SAS software, achieving an intra-class correlation coefficent value exceeding 0.999 for all time-series of presence, abundance and biomass. The functions implemented in the gulf package are briefly described and the results of time-series comparisons are presented through figures and tables reporting the different correlation coefficients. Minor discrepancies between the time-series resulted from cases when weights derived from length measurements differed from recorded catch weights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.093
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.093
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFisheries and Oceans Canada / Pêches et Océans Canada - PublicationsFrench-language works237,207