MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6958470569 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12152472

Female foeticide on rise in India: Causes, Effects and the role of media to overcome this problem.

2020· article· en· W6958470569 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationGirlPopulationHuman lifePrime ministerPhenomenonHuman rights

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since time immemorial, human civilization has witnessed one thing in common among entire nations on this planet and i.e. exploitation of women. Women who roughly constitute half a human population have been discriminated, harassed and exploited irrespective of the country to which they belong, unmindful of the religion, which they profess, and oblivious of the time-frame in which they live. Though we consider this century as an advanced and modern one, still women are confronting new challenges and facing severe threats to maintain respect, equality and dignity. Female foeticide is perhaps one of the worst forms of violence against women where a woman is denied her most basic and fundamental right i.e. “the right to life”. The phenomenon of female feticide in India is not new, where female embryos or fetuses are selectively eliminated after pre-natal redetermination, thus eliminating girl child even before they are born.<br> Authors Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner have argued that if women could choose their birthplace, India might not be a wise choice for any of them to born. It is estimated that more than 10 million female foetuses have been illegally aborted in India. Researchers for the Lancet Journal based in Canada and India stated that 500,000 girls were being lost annually through sex-selective abortions. The land of martyred former Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi has been killing its daughters by the millions for decades. Nationwide, the numbers of girls for every 1000 boys has dropped from 975 in 1961 to 910 in 2011.The situation is particularly alarming in some of the urban areas of Punjab, Rajasthan, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh; especially in parts of Punjab, where there are only 300 girls for every 1,000 boys, according to Laura Turquet, Action Aid’s Women’s Rights policy official. It has been widely noticed that Punjabi culture is extremely violent as well as abusive towards the women at large, with no respect for the fairer sex.<br> Hence, this research paper wants to throw light that what are the factors behind Gender-bias and pitiable conditions of the Girl child. How far Indian media is responsible for stereotyping the women and portraying her as an inferior being? What possible roles can government, media and social action-groups can play in women empowerment and to fight the cancerous mentalities which led couples to abort female fetuses. This Research Paper intends to evaluate the problem, causes behind it and to find innovative and peaceful solutions for the biggest challenge 21<sup>st</sup> century India face.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFrench-language works237,207