MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6958549231 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20425161

Timely diagnostics and safe procedures in children with anterior mediastinal masses (AMMs): a qualitative review of the AMM protocol at BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver BC

2022· article· en· W6958549231 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)PerioperativeMediastinal massSedationOtorhinolaryngologyAnesthesiologyAnestheticPatient safety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of an anterior mediastinal mass should prompt rapid triage, workup and treatment to effectively manage and prevent emergent complications. Implementation of an AMM protocol can ensure the response is standardized and coordinated. Importantly, such a protocol can encourage prompt multi-disciplinary communication to mitigate risks associated with procedures required for timely diagnosis. The aim of this review is to evaluate the BC Children’s Hospital’s Pediatric New/Suspected Anterior Mediastinal Mass (AMM) Protocol. Retrospective chart review was conducted for 18 patients admitted from February 2016 to May 2020 with AMM for whom the protocol was enacted. Primary parameters assessed presence of high-risk feature at time of presentation, time from admission and/or protocol activation to specific time points, including imaging, first diagnostic procedure, and diagnosis. Data regarding perioperative management, including anesthetic considerations and peri-operative complications, was also collected. Mean time from protocol activation to first diagnostic procedure and diagnosis were 1.88 days (range 0–7) and 2.24 days (range 0–7), respectively. The majority of procedures were conducted under sedation (n = 77, 64%), followed by general anesthetic (GA; n = 34, 28%) and local anesthetic (n = 10, 8%). Despite 15 cases having more than one high risk feature, pre-operative steroids were only administered for four of the total 158 procedures (3%) and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) and otolaryngology (ENT) were only required for immediate availability for seven procedures (4%). Furthermore, only 10 procedures (8%) had associated complications and none of these complications resulted in patient death. Our data demonstrate that implementation of a streamlined multi-disciplinary protocol can expedite time to diagnosis without impacting patient safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicMyasthenia Gravis and ThymomaFrench-language works237,207