Segregation of compared with the segregation of the white spotting phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<b>Copyright information:</b>Taken from "Exclusion of and as the basis for white spotting in Border Collies"Genome Biology 2000;1(2):research0004.1-research0004.4.Published online 28 Jul 2000PMCID:PMC15016.Copyright © 2000 GenomeBiology.com Genomic DNA digested with II was probed with a radioactively labeled fragment of DNA which detected a II restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) between the Border Collie and Newfoundland grandparents. BC, DNA from the Border Collie grandparent; N, DNA from the Newfoundland grandparent. F1, DNA from the first generation hybrids of the Newfoundland × Border Collie cross; F2, DNA from the progeny of intercrosses between the F1 hybrids; s, white spotted; ns, not white spotted. The presumed genotypes for the locus are shown below the lanes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.190 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".