<i>Starmerella guilliamiae </i>f.a, sp. nov. and <i>Starmerella monicapupoiae </i>f.a., sp. nov. de novo assemblies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four yeast isolates collected from flowers in different ecosystems in Brazil, one from fruit of Nothofagus alpina in Argentina, two from pods of Neltuma chilensis in Chile, and one obtained from the proventriculus a of female bumblebee in Canada were shown by the analysis of the sequences of the ITS region and D1/D2 domains of the large subunit of the rRNA gene to represent two novel species belonging to the genus Starmerella. These species are described here as Starmerella gilliamiae f.a, sp. nov. (CBS16166T), and Starmerella monicapupoiae f.a., sp. nov. (CBS16165T). A phylogenomic analysis showed that S. guilliamiae belongs to a subclade that contains S. opuntiae, S. aceti, and S. apicola. The same analyses showed that Starmerella monicapupoiae is phylogenetically related to S. riodocensis. The two isolates of Starmerella monicapupoiae were obtained from flowers in Brazil and are probably vectored by insects that visit these substrates. Starmerella guilliamae has a wide geographical distribution having been isolated in flowers in Brazil, fruit in Argentina, plant tissues in Chile, and a bumblebee in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".