MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6958706757 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26677784

Additional file 1 of Global positioning system-based food environment exposures, diet-related, and cardiometabolic health outcomes: a systematic review and research agenda

2024· article· en· W6958706757 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)CINAHLPsycINFOScopusScale (ratio)Quality (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Table S1a. History and Search Details Pubmed October 31, 2022. Table S1b. History and Search Details Embase October 31, 2022. Table S1c. History and Search Details Cinahl (Ebsco) October 31, 2022. Table S1d. History and Search Details PsycInfo (Ebsco) October 31, 2022. Table 1e. History and Search Details WEB OF SCIENCE Core Collection October 31, 2022. Table S1f. History and Search Details SCOPUS October 31, 2022. Table S1g. History and Search Details IBSS October 31, 2022. Table S2. Data extraction table. Table S3. Quality assessment according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and included items from Cetateanu et al.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.087
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.087
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0130.019
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8240.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→