Feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a tailored self-compassion program for peer mentors within Canadian spinal cord injury community service organizations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined (1) the feasibility and acceptability of a tailored self-compassion program for peer mentors in Canadian spinal cord injury (SCI) community service organizations and (2) its effectiveness in improving compassion fatigue. compassion satisfaction, self-compassion, and mental health from pre to post and pre to 6-week follow-up. We co-developed this study with two Canadian SCI organizations. Fifteen peer mentors completed the self-compassion program. Each participant completed three surveys (pre/post/6-week follow-up) and two interviews (post/6-week follow-up). Non-parametric tests were used to examine quantitative changes in the outcome variables. Qualitative data were analyzed using directed content analysis (feasibility and acceptability data) and thematic analysis (effectiveness data). The program was feasible and acceptable. Compassion fatigue decreased from pre to post and pre to follow-up. Total self-compassion and mental health increased from pre to post and pre to follow-up. Four themes were identified: from a self-critic to a self-ally, being a better peer mentor, building resilience, and benefits to the organization. At follow-up, peer mentors had evolving perspectives of the self and improved mental health. The results from this study provide insight into the benefits of a tailored self-compassion program for peer mentors, the mentees they provide care to, and the organizations delivering the peer support programs. A tailored self-compassion program is feasible and acceptable for peer mentors within Canadian spinal cord injury community service organizationsA tailored self-compassion program can help reduce compassion fatigue and improve self-compassion and mental health among peer mentors A tailored self-compassion program is feasible and acceptable for peer mentors within Canadian spinal cord injury community service organizations A tailored self-compassion program can help reduce compassion fatigue and improve self-compassion and mental health among peer mentors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".