MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

martin et al_wild turkey roost microclimate data

2025· dataset· en· W6958782819 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroclimateAir temperatureTree (set theory)Diameter at breast heightTree health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We studied microclimate variables (specifically overnight wind speeds, air temperatures, and accumulated precipitation) at roost trees used by eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) near Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. We also measured tree characteristics (diameter at breast height and whether the tree was coniferous or deciduous). We measured the same conditions and characteristics at non-roost trees paired with the roost trees. We sampled 25 winter roost pairs and 30 summer roost trees (i.e., pairs in which the roost tree was known to be used by turkeys during winter and summer, respectively). For each pair, the non-roost tree was nearby (50 m away from the roost tree) and represented a tree that was available to turkeys but not apparently used (based on GPS-tagged turkeys and visual inspection for evidence of roosting). Data for winter roost trees were collected from December 1, 2022, to March 27, 2023; and data for summer roost trees were collected from June 1, 2023, to September 25, 2023.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)Same topicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsFrench-language works237,207