MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6958828776 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3293033

UNDERSTORY VEGETATION AND ENVIRONMENT RESPONSES TO TILLAGE, FOREST HARVESTING, AND CONIFER PLANTATION DEVELOPMENT

2016· other· en· W6958828776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderstoryDeciduousSpecies richnessDetrended correspondence analysisCanopyBiodiversityVegetation (pathology)Coarse woody debrisSpecies diversityMoss

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing demand to conserve biodiversity in managed forests necessitates better understanding of the impacts of forestry practices on the species-rich herbaceous layer. We compared composition and diversity of understory vegetation, environmental features, and stand structure of forests in New Brunswick, Canada, under four different management scenarios, including: young (24–66 yr) naturally regenerated forests and conifer plantations (19–64 yr) established after clear-cutting, mature (77–100 yr) naturally regenerated forests originating from natural disturbance (insect defoliation), and old-field plantations (31–77 yr) established on abandoned agricultural fields. The objectives were to determine how plant composition, forest structure, and microenvironment differed among stand types and which environmental or structural features were related to understory species. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) and multiresponse permutation procedure (MRPP) indicated that stand types differed in species composition and environments. Plantations were significantly lower in density of snags, deciduous canopy cover, and leaf substrate, and higher in coniferous canopy cover and needle, twig, and moss substrates than the natural stands. Old-field plantations had less cover of pits and mounds than all other stand types. Mature natural stands contained the greatest amount of coarse woody debris (CWD) in all decay classes and snags >14 cm diameter, and the lowest density of trees >5 cm diameter and moss cover. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) showed that species in both natural stand types are associated with decayed CWD, deciduous cover, and leaf substrate. Species in cutover plantations were associated with coniferous cover and needle substrate. Species composition in old-field plantations was distinct, with the lowest species richness and diversity of all stand types. We present a conceptual model illustrating the initial direct effects of previous land use and harvesting or postharvest treatments and the subsequent indirect effects associated with plantation or natural stand development on environmental features and understory vegetation. We recommend extending plantation harvest cycles to facilitate reestablishment and expansion of plant populations and maintaining diverse tree canopy composition, coarse woody debris, and pit and mound topography to sustain critical habitat for vascular understory plant species in managed forests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it