Combining generative modelling and semi-supervised domain adaptation for whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Quantification of three-dimensional (3D) cardiac anatomy is important for the evaluation of cardiovascular diseases. Changes in anatomy are indicative of remodeling processes as the heart tissue adapts to disease. Although robust segmentation methods exist for computed tomography angiography (CTA), few methods exist for whole-heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiograms (CMRA) which are more challenging due to variable contrast, lower signal to noise ratio and a limited amount of labeled data. Methods Two state-of-the-art unsupervised generative deep learning domain adaptation architectures, generative adversarial networks and variational auto-encoders, were applied to 3D whole heart segmentation of both conventional (n = 20) and high-resolution (n = 45) CMRA (target) images, given segmented CTA (source) images for training. An additional supervised loss function was implemented to improve performance given 10%, 20% and 30% segmented CMRA cases. A fully supervised nn-UNet trained on the given CMRA segmentations was used as the benchmark. Results The addition of a small number of segmented CMRA training cases substantially improved performance in both generative architectures in both standard and high-resolution datasets. Compared with the nn-UNet benchmark, the generative methods showed substantially better performance in the case of limited labelled cases. On the standard CMRA dataset, an average 12% (adversarial method) and 10% (variational method) improvement in Dice score was obtained. Conclusions Unsupervised domain-adaptation methods for CMRA segmentation can be boosted by the addition of a small number of supervised target training cases. When only few labelled cases are available, semi-supervised generative modelling is superior to supervised methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".