MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

<b>The Role of Governance in Enhancing Sustainability in the Mining Sector</b><b>A Confirmatory Study Through a Survey</b>

2025· article· en· W6958866721 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate governanceSustainabilityStakeholderSocial sustainabilitySustainable developmentStakeholder engagementEnvironmental governanceSustainability organizations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Governance is a fundamental driver of sustainability in the mining sector, ensuring a balance between economic growth, environmental preservation, and social responsibility. This study explores the intricate relationship between governance mechanisms and sustainable mining practices, emphasizing the role of transparency, regulatory compliance, accountability, and stakeholder engagement. To validate these theoretical frameworks, a structured survey was conducted among mining industry stakeholders, including regulatory bodies, corporate executives, and local communities. The results corroborate existing literature, highlighting that robust governance frameworks significantly enhance environmental sustainability and social welfare in mining operations.Previous research underscores the importance of governance in mitigating the adverse environmental and social impacts of mining. Regulatory enforcement, corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, and technological integration have been widely recognized as essential tools for sustainable mining. This study strengthens these conclusions by providing empirical evidence through quantitative analysis, demonstrating a direct correlation between governance practices and sustainability outcomes. The findings reveal that companies adhering to stringent governance policies exhibit lower environmental degradation rates, stronger community relations, and higher operational efficiencies.Furthermore, the study identifies key governance challenges, such as weak regulatory oversight, resistance to transparency, and economic constraints in implementing sustainable practices. Comparative case studies from Canada, Australia, and Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 initiatives illustrate effective governance models that can be adapted globally. The research concludes with policy recommendations advocating for enhanced digital governance mechanisms, standardized international regulatory frameworks, and increased stakeholder participation to promote a more sustainable mining industry. These insights contribute to the growing body of knowledge in sustainable resource management and provide a roadmap for policymakers and industry leaders to foster responsible mining practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicMining and Resource Management→French-language works237,207→