House Unpassed Legislation 1851, Docket 3139, SC1/series 230, Petition of Jonas W. Clark
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Petition subject: School discrimination Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029724 Date of creation: 1851-02 Petition location: Boston Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: William Schouler, Boston; committee on education Selected signatures: Jonas W. Clark Emiliano F.B. Mundrucu Jeremiah Harvey Henry Weeden Thomas Dalton William Lawson Benjamin P. Bassett Charles Rose William Brown John Wright John P. Coburn James Johnson Samuel Wilson Jacob Sampson William James Watkins Ottawa West Jeremiah Stewart John H. Sterling John W.B. Smith William B. Robinson Robert Johnson Patrick H. Allen Henry Randolph Peter M. Howard Thomas Cummings Joseph N. Butler Thomas G. Williams Peter F. Gill George Washington Lewis Hayden W.H. Logan Leonard A. Grimes Lemuel Burr Actions taken on dates: 1851-03-08,1851-03-10 Legislative action: Received in the House on March 8, 1851 and referred to the committee on education and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on March 10, 1851 and concurred Total signatures: 42 Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred Males of color signatures: 42 Female only signatures: No Identifications of signatories: constituting a portion of the citizens of Boston, being deprived of the advantages of Common School Privileges, solely on account of complexion, [males of color], ["legal voters"], ["colored men and their families"] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Printed Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents Additional archivist notes: Includes addresses; men signed for families, representing 186 peoples Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1851, Docket 3139 Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.224 | 0.100 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".