Replication Data for: Systemic biological mechanisms underpin poor post-discharge growth among severely wasted children with HIV
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>This is a replication dataset for the manuscript titled: "<strong><i>Systemic biological mechanisms underpin poor post-discharge growth among severely wasted children with HIV</i></strong>."</p> <p>In sub-Saharan Africa, a proportion of children hospitalised with severe malnutrition (SM) also have HIV infection (HIV-SM). Children with HIV-SM have poorer clinical outcomes than children with SM alone. They face high mortality both during and after hospitalisation, have impaired nutritional recovery post-hospitalisation and have increased relapse recovery. Despite this elevated risks biological mechanisms underlying the risk remain unclear. This study is nested with the CHAIN cohort sites in Kenya, Uganda, Malawi and Burkina Faso. The current study aimed to understand how HIV influences post-discharge growth among children with HIV-SM in sub-Saharan Africa. In the current study proteins from plasma collected from children at hospital discharge were quantified using SomaScan assay. Over 7300 proteins were quantified. The analysis also included anthropometric measurements e.g., mid-upper arm circumference, weight-for-age, weight-for-height and height-for-age scores taken at discharge, 45-days post-discharge, 90-days post-discharge, and 180-days post-discharge. Demographic data included sex, age, site of enrolment. </p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.493 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it