Fragmentation-Based QM/MM Simulations: Length Dependence of Chain Dynamics and Hydrogen Bonding of Polyethylene Oxide and Polyethylene in Aqueous Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular fragmentation quantum mechanics (QM) calculations have been combined with molecular mechanics (MM) to construct the fragmentation QM/MM method for simulations of dilute solutions of macromolecules. We adopt the electrostatics embedding QM/MM model, where the low-cost generalized energy-based fragmentation calculations are employed for the QM part. Conformation energy calculations, geometry optimizations, and Born−Oppenheimer molecular dynamics simulations of poly(ethylene oxide), PEOn (n = 6−20), and polyethylene, PEn (n = 9−30), in aqueous solution have been performed within the framework of both fragmentation and conventional QM/MM methods. The intermolecular hydrogen bonding and chain configurations obtained from the fragmentation QM/MM simulations are consistent with the conventional QM/MM method. The length dependence of chain conformations and dynamics of PEO and PE oligomers in aqueous solutions is also investigated through the fragmentation QM/MM molecular dynamics simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".