MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6959132223 · doi:10.7939/dvn/ztiwor

2016 Census of Canadian Academic Librarians

2017· dataset· en· W6959132223 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2017
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaQueen's UniversityMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensusMicrodata (statistics)American Community SurveyHigher educationAcademic library

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada's first census of Canadian academic librarians was conducted by the Canadian Association of Academic Librarians (CAPAL) from June to September, 2016. </p> <p> The goal of the census is to build a comprehensive demographic picture of the profession of academic librarianship by collecting data about librarians working in colleges and university libraries in Canada. It is the intention of CAPAL to share the data for research, policy development, and education purposes. </p> Attached are three reports: <br> 2016 Census of Canadian Academic Librarians User Guide and Results Summary (English and French) <br> 2016 Census of Canadian Academic Librarians Cross Tabulation Report (English and French is forthcoming) <br> 2016 Census of Canadian Academic Librarians Microdata

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisFrench-language works237,207