MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6959146018 · doi:10.1021/jp808837k.s001

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and the Auger Parameter As Tools for Characterization of Silica-Supported Pd Catalysts for the Suzuki−Miyaura Reaction

2016· article· en· W6959146018 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyCatalysisPalladiumOxidation stateAuger electron spectroscopyAmorphous solidBinding energyAuger

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palladium has been immobilized on thiol-modified mesoporous and amorphous silicates and used as a catalyst for the Suzuki−Miyaura reaction. Heterogeneous catalysts are difficult to characterize due to the difficulty of applying traditional solution state characterization methods like NMR to solid samples. As such, the catalysts are often poorly understood. In an effort to better understand the oxidation state and electronic environment of both the reactive palladium center and the thiol ligands through which it is bound in the catalyst, we characterized a wide range of both Suzuki−Miyaura catalysts and Pd compounds by both X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray induced Auger spectroscopy (XAES) focusing on Pd, S, and Si. The use of XAES data allows determination of the Auger parameter for Pd and S, which provides information not only on oxidation state but also on the polarizability of the surrounding ligands in the catalyst. Changes in XPS binding energy and XAES kinetic energy are discussed particularly in terms of the nature of the reactive Pd center before and after use, and the effects on the S ligand as a function of Pd loading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsFrench-language works237,207