MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Survey of Surveys

2022· article· en· W6959305603 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Social FundNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesAustralian Astronomical Optics-MacquarieInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamNational Development and Reform CommissionIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoJohns Hopkins UniversityMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungYork UniversityMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftChinese Academy of SciencesLeibniz-GemeinschaftAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean Science FoundationW. M. Keck FoundationMacquarie UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonFondazione Cassa di Risparmio di FirenzeUniversity of OxfordLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryAstrophysics DivisionNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesUniversity of Notre DameEuropean Regional Development FundCarnegie Mellon UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonEuropean Space AgencyUniversity of PortsmouthNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of UtahNational Science FoundationYale UniversityU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationVanderbilt UniversityAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
KeywordsCalibrationFunction (biology)PanoramaPlan (archaeology)Point (geometry)Abundance (ecology)Galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. In the present-day panorama of large spectroscopic surveys, the amount, diversity, and complexity of the available data continuously increase. The overarching goal of studying the formation and evolution of our Galaxy is hampered by the heterogeneity of instruments, selection functions, analysis methods, and measured quantities. Aims. We present a comprehensive catalogue, the Survey of Surveys (SoS), built by homogeneously merging the radial velocity (RV) determinations of the largest ground-based spectroscopic surveys to date, such as APOGEE, GALAH, Gaia-ESO, RAVE, and LAMOST, using Gaia as a reference. This pilot study serves to prove the concept and to test the methodology that we plan to apply in the future to the stellar parameters and abundance ratios as well. Methods. We have devised a multi-staged procedure that includes: (i) the cross match between Gaia and the spectroscopic surveys using the official Gaia cross-match algorithm, (ii) the normalisation of uncertainties using repeated measurements or the three-cornered hat method, (iii) the cross calibration of the RVs as a function of the main parameters on which depend (magnitude, effective temperature, surface gravity, metallicity, and signal-to-noise ratio) to remove trends and zero point offsets, and (iv) the comparison with external high-resolution samples, such as the Gaia RV standards and the Geneva-Copenhagen survey, to validate the homogenisation procedure and to calibrate the RV zero-point of the SoS catalogue. Results. We provide the largest homogenised RV catalogue to date, containing almost 11 million stars, of which about half come exclusively from Gaia and half in combination with the ground-based surveys. We estimate the accuracy of the RV zero-point to be about 0.16−0.31 km s−1 and the RV precision to be in the range 0.05−1.50 km s−1 depending on the type of star and on its survey provenance. We validate the SoS RVs with open clusters from a high resolution homogeneous samples and provide the systemic velocity of 55 individual open clusters. Additionally, we provide median RVs for 532 clusters recently discovered by Gaia data. Conclusions. The SoS is publicly available and ready to be applied to various research projects, such as the study of star clusters, Galactic archaeology, stellar streams, or the characterisation of planet-hosting stars, to name a few. We also plan to include survey updates and more data sources in future versions of the SoS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it