Life downtown: a strategy to encourage market-rate housing in Calgary's downtown
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Master's Degree Project (MDP) looked at ways that the Calgary City Council and planners can foster market-rate housing developments in the City's central business district (CBD). The policy objects are two fold: to increase the vitality of the 'dead' downtown core after business hours and to decrease some of the pressure on suburban development leading towards a more sustainable city. The MDP's purpose was to describe some strategies that could work for the City to increase the number of residential units in the CBD after examining the approaches for other Canadian and American cities. Attitudinal interviews were held with some members of the downtown residential development industry and with some of the Aldermen who were available for comment. The conclusions drawn suggest that it may only be a matter of timing before the market in Calgary is at a stage where the CBD becomes attractive enough to support housing developments. Some citizens of Calgary are already beginning to see the benefits of living in downtown; whereas, it will just take longer for other to accept residences in the Central Business District.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".