MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6959475342 · doi:10.11575/prism/40015

The vía campesina: peasants resisting globalization

2003· other· en· W6959475342 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Calgary · 2003
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringPeasantGlobalizationAgrarian societyPovertyRural povertyAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite decades of 'development', hunger and poverty persist in rural areas around the world. With the implementation of structural adjustment programs, regional trade agreements and the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements, rural landscapes everywhere are undergoing rapid change. National governments are restructuring agricultural policies to facilitate greater integration into an international market-driven economy. Concerted attempts to exclude peasants and small-scale farming peoples interests in decision-making and rural policy development have been accompanied by the formation of an international peasant and farm movement, the Via Campesina, which emerged in 1993. This dissertation examines the response of peasant and farm organizations to the increased globalization of a 'modem', industrial and neoliberal model of agriculture by analyzing the formation, consolidation and functioning of the Via Campesina. To date, studies of transnational anti-globalization movements have virtually ignored agrarian activism. Yet, in many countries peasants and farmers have been at the forefront of national struggles against globalization and through the Via Campesina peasant-based resistance has now moved beyond national borders. At the international level peasants and farmers are now leading the way by introducing new concepts like food sovereignty. They are also using the most powerful tools available to social movements - that of non-participation and delegitimization. The Via Campesina is using three traditional weapons of the weak - organization, cooperation and community to redefine rural development and to build an alternative model for rural communities, one that is based on social justice, gender equality and environmental sustainability. Using an analysis of Via Campesina conference proceedings, minutes of the meetings of the Women's Commission and the International Coordination Commission of the Via Campesina, participant observation in numerous Via Campesina events, interviews with key farm leaders, and field work conducted in Mexico, Canada and India, this study explores the main issues, positions, strategies and collective actions of the Via Campesina. In doing so it provides insights into the nature and extent of current agrarian activism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of CalgaryFrench-language works237,207