Identification of a Novel η<sup>2</sup>-Se<sub>2</sub> Bonding Mode in Cu(I) Complexes of the Dimeric Selenocarbonyl Dianions, [(EPh<sub>2</sub>P)<sub>2</sub>CSeSeC(PPh<sub>2</sub>E)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2−</sup> (E = S, Se)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A metathetical reaction between [Li(TMEDA)][(H)C(PPh<sub>2</sub>Se)<sub>2</sub>] and CuCl<sub>2</sub> in a 2:1 molar ratio afforded the dimeric Cu(I) complex, {Cu<sub>2</sub>-η<sup>2</sup>:η<sup>2</sup>-[(EPh<sub>2</sub>P)<sub>2</sub>CSeSeC(PPh<sub>2</sub>E)<sub>2</sub>]} (E = Se), via a selenium−proton exchange <i>and</i> an internal redox process. The analogous sulfur-containing complex (E = S) was obtained by the reactions of the dianions [(Se)C(PPh<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2−</sup> and [(SPh<sub>2</sub>P)<sub>2</sub>CSeSeC(PPh<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2−</sup> with Cu(II) and Cu(I) halides, respectively. Structural characterization of the Cu(I) complexes reveals a unique η<sup>2</sup>-Se<sub>2</sub> bonding mode for the generic diselenide ligand system RSe−SeR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.021 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.022 | 0.013 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.016 | 0.026 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.024 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".