Recent variability of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation inferred from surface heat and freshwater fluxes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An annual-mean surface-forced component of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation (THC) in density space, surf(,?), is diagnosed from observed surface heat and freshwater fluxes. The climatological mean of surf over 1980–97 indicates steady overturning rates for those water masses that are principally formed through surface buoyancy forcing: 8 Sv of Greenland Sea Deep Water (GSDW), 4 Sv of Labrador Sea Water (LSW), and 4 Sv of 18° Water (STMW). Obtained for each year over 1980–97, surf reveals interannual-to-decadal variability in the renewal and overturning of these water masses. The total surface-forced overturning rate varies in the range 10–20 Sv, reaching peak values in 1989–90 and generally decreasing over the period 1990–97. More dramatic changes are apparent in the overturning of different water masses. The overturning of STMW exhibits large-amplitude interannual variability. A background positive trend over 1980–97 is dominated by variance of 13.4 Sv. By contrast, the overturning rates of LSW and GSDW vary more slowly, on decadal timescales. LSW overturning rates increase from near zero in the early 1980s to a maximum of 10 Sv in 1990 and return to near zero by 1997. Seemingly in antiphase, GSDW overturning rates decline from a peak rate of 11 Sv in 1981 to a minimum of 3.5 Sv in 1991, and then increase somewhat up to 1997.<br/><br/>The variability in these overturning rates is related to changes in the North Atlantic oscillation (NAO) and the Arctic oscillation (AO) over 1980–97. Correlation coefficients between total overturning rate and three versions of the NAO index are significantly positive at a 99% confidence level. Also highly significant is a correlation of LSW overturning and the AO index, and an anticorrelation between overturning of LSW and GSDW. The overturning of STMW is more weakly (and not significantly) anticorrelated with NAO indices, although there is highly significant anticorrelation between interannual changes in STMW overturning and one version of the NAO index. Stronger LSW (GSDW) overturning in years when NAO indices are relatively high (low) is consistent with recent hydrographic evidence. The extent to which these relationships support a hypothesis that the NAO drives interannual-to-decadal variability in the THC, through wintertime atmospheric buoyancy forcing of the ocean, is discussed.<br/>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".