Inclusive χ<sub>bJ</sub>(nP) decays to D<sup>0</sup>X
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using Υ(2S) and Υ(3S) data collected with the CLEO III detector we have searched for decays of χ<sub>bJ</sub> to final states with open charm. We fully reconstruct D<sup>0</sup> mesons with p<sub>D<sup>0</sup></sub>>2.5 GeV/c in three decay modes (K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup>, and K<sup>-</sup>π<sup>-</sup>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>+</sup>) in coincidence with radiative transition photons that tag the production of one of the χ<sub>bJ</sub>(nP) states. Significant signals are obtained for the two J=1 states. Recent nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD) calculations of χ<sub>bJ</sub>(nP)→cc̅ X depend on one nonperturbative parameter per χ<sub>bJ</sub> triplet. The extrapolation from the observed D<sup>0</sup>X rate over a limited momentum range to a full cc̅ X rate also depends on these same parameters. Using our data to fit for these parameters, we extract results which agree well with NRQCD predictions, confirming the expectation that charm production is largest for the J=1 states. In particular, for J=1, our results are consistent with cc̅ g accounting for about one-quarter of all hadronic decays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".