Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During her long life, Christie Harris has written hundreds of stories and radio programmes for children in a variety of modes and with a wide range of subjects, but it is for her versions of Pacific Northwest Indian tales that she is most famous and for which she has won many awards such as the Canada Council's Award for Children's Literature (now the Governor General's Award).Inevitably, given the current negative climate of thinking about white appropriation of native culture, for a critic such as myself to be writing about an author such as Harris is to be involved at once in controversy.A radical rethinking over the past twenty years of the relationship between the dominant white Canadian culture and the native First Nations cultures has led to a different understanding of the rights of a culturally appropriated society than was prevalent during the years when Harris was writing her books.It seems likely that, were she to be starting her career as an author today, Christie Harris would not feel comfortable with at least the early material for which she has become famous, so sensitive an issue has cultural appropriation become in Canadian intellectual life.Nevertheless, I hope to point out later in this essay that, even thirty years ago, when she was casting her versions of the tales in Raven's Cry and Once Upon a Totem, she was very much aware both of the responsibilities that went with her task and of the need to educate herself as best she could about native culture before she ever wrote a word of the retellings.She knew that the great tales, the histories, of those called by her the Lords of the Coast were the possessions of individual families and thus needed to be treated with respect.She knew, too, that her versions of these tales should be regarded as no more than mediations between their native origins and a white audience and never as replacements.True, her earliest writing about native culture which appears for a children's page in The Vancouver Daily Province when she was twenty years old, in the late 1920s, was full of stereotyping and condescension, a troubling trend in many children's books of the same era.Her later books, though, for which she is best known, show a much different understanding of the great culture she was writing about.One needs to keep in mind also that the native tales make up only a minor amount of Harris's output over seventy years of writing.She also wrote a large number of other stories for children, both published and broadcast, radio dramas and talks and juvenile fantasies, a few poems, and whole books historical, fantastical and ficto-biographical, all on a variety of subjects.Too, though this fact may be less well-known, she wrote adult radio dramas and women's
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.873 | 0.127 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it