MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6959680381 · doi:10.11575/prism/34699

Biocritical Essay (Christie Harris)

2000· other· fr· W6959680381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2000
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPsidium guajava Extracts and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppropriationWhite (mutation)Variety (cybernetics)Cultural appropriationGovernorIndigenous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During her long life, Christie Harris has written hundreds of stories and radio programmes for children in a variety of modes and with a wide range of subjects, but it is for her versions of Pacific Northwest Indian tales that she is most famous and for which she has won many awards such as the Canada Council's Award for Children's Literature (now the Governor General's Award).Inevitably, given the current negative climate of thinking about white appropriation of native culture, for a critic such as myself to be writing about an author such as Harris is to be involved at once in controversy.A radical rethinking over the past twenty years of the relationship between the dominant white Canadian culture and the native First Nations cultures has led to a different understanding of the rights of a culturally appropriated society than was prevalent during the years when Harris was writing her books.It seems likely that, were she to be starting her career as an author today, Christie Harris would not feel comfortable with at least the early material for which she has become famous, so sensitive an issue has cultural appropriation become in Canadian intellectual life.Nevertheless, I hope to point out later in this essay that, even thirty years ago, when she was casting her versions of the tales in Raven's Cry and Once Upon a Totem, she was very much aware both of the responsibilities that went with her task and of the need to educate herself as best she could about native culture before she ever wrote a word of the retellings.She knew that the great tales, the histories, of those called by her the Lords of the Coast were the possessions of individual families and thus needed to be treated with respect.She knew, too, that her versions of these tales should be regarded as no more than mediations between their native origins and a white audience and never as replacements.True, her earliest writing about native culture which appears for a children's page in The Vancouver Daily Province when she was twenty years old, in the late 1920s, was full of stereotyping and condescension, a troubling trend in many children's books of the same era.Her later books, though, for which she is best known, show a much different understanding of the great culture she was writing about.One needs to keep in mind also that the native tales make up only a minor amount of Harris's output over seventy years of writing.She also wrote a large number of other stories for children, both published and broadcast, radio dramas and talks and juvenile fantasies, a few poems, and whole books historical, fantastical and ficto-biographical, all on a variety of subjects.Too, though this fact may be less well-known, she wrote adult radio dramas and women's

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8730.127

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it