MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Suspended Solids\nand Optimal RNase Inhibitors Impact\nthe Partitioning and Decay of SARS-CoV‑2 in Wastewater

2024· article· en· W6959699903 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWastewaterRNase PExtraction (chemistry)Sewage treatmentEnteric virusVirusBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing COVID-19, can be monitored in wastewater due to its presence in human fecal matter. While wastewater surveillance programs for COVID-19 have already been implemented in many countries, fundamental questions remain regarding the distribution and decay of both SARS-CoV-2 and the common fecal indicator pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV). In this study, for wastewater samples at 4 °C, the first-order decay rate constant (<i>k</i>) for a spiked coronavirus (HCoV 229E) was greater in mixtures with low TSS concentrations (0.373 ± 0.021 day<sup>–1</sup>) than in those with high concentrations (0.204 ± 0.014 day<sup>–1</sup>), which was consistent with measurements of the extended activity of RNases. Increasing the concentration of nontargeted and targeted RNase inhibitors revealed that the loss of the viral signal from the extraction is mainly due to the activity of RNA-degrading enzymes. A reanalysis of wastewater samples from Quebec City, Canada, with a 10× concentration of β-mercaptoethanol, a nontargeted RNase inhibitor, achieved an increase in SARS-CoV-2 and PMMoV concentrations. This investigation revealed further optimization avenues for improving the detection limit of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater and enhancing the efficiency of wastewater surveillance programs, particularly in times of low viral prevalence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207