From institutions to boundaries: work and carriers in Canada's oil sands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this dissertation I explore environmental practices and environmental regulations in Alberta, Canada's in situ oil sands industry. The in situ oil sands industty provides an interesting context for studying these two phenomena because it was undergoing a period of high growth and subject to immense public scrutiny, particularly in regards to environmental issues. I begin by asking the question: Who does what institutional work on environmental regulations and practices in Canada's oil sands? I explore this broad research question using analytic induction, a qualitative research method that allows the researcher to explore phenomena from a predetermined theoretical lens. In my case, this lens is institutional work. I include many different types of organizations in my san1ple of 67 semi-structured interviews. As I progress through my analysis I discover that much of the work done on practices and regulations involves boundaries. Boundary work emerges as an important aspect of institutional change, as does the type of actor doing the work and the boundary being worked on. I develop propositions based on the strength of boundaries, the position of actors in the field of in situ oil sands, and the boundary the work is done on.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".