MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6959989449 · doi:10.11575/prism/39840

The Effects of Simulated Altitude on Maximal and Submaximal Exercise

2021· other· en· W6959989449 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood lactateCyclingHeart rateVentilation (architecture)Effects of high altitude on humansHyperoxiaHypoxia (environmental)Incremental exerciseVentilatory threshold

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) identifies the upper limit of sustainable exercise; however, the extent to which an individual’s MLSS is affected by changes in altitude is unknown. The primary objective of this thesis was to determine the extent to which the MLSS-associated cycling power output (PO) (MLSSp), assessed in normoxia (NORM; FIO2=20.9 %) at 1111 m in Calgary, AB, is affected by acute exposure to simulated hypoxia (HYPO; FIO2=18.2 %) and hyperoxia (HYPER; FIO2=23.8 %). The secondary objective was to evaluate metabolic, cardiorespiratory, perceptual and neuromuscular responses to 30 min of cycling at similar relative intensities (i.e., MLSSp, and 10 W above the MLSSp (MLSSp+10)), and the same absolute intensity of exercise (i.e., the normoxic MLSSp; MLSSpNORM) in these same FIO2 conditions. Eleven (4 females, 7 males) participants completed this study. MLSSp decreased in HYPO (209±54 W) compared to NORM (225±58 W; p=0.001), but HYPER (230±56 W; p<0.001) was not different from NORM (p>0.05). Four participants reached task failure prior to 30 min in the HYPO condition at MLSSpNORM, in addition to two, three and three participants in NORM, HYPO and HYPER, respectively, at MLSSp+10. At MLSSp and MLSSp+10 blood lactate concentration ([BLa]), ventilation (V?E), heart rate (HR) and perceptual responses to exercise did not differ between FIO2 conditions (p>0.05), despite a difference in V?O2 (p<0.05). In contrast, at MLSSpNORM, V?O2 was similar across conditions (p>0.05), whereas [BLa], V?E, HR and perceptual response to exercise were exacerbated in HYPO compared to both NORM and HYPER (p<0.05). Exercising in each condition elicited neuromuscular fatigue—manifesting as a reduction in quadriceps isometric maximal voluntary contraction, high- and low-frequency doublet, and single twitch force amplitudes—but no differences were detectable between conditions at any exercise intensity (p>0.05). In summary, a small decrease in FIO2, relative to ambient conditions, reduced the cycling MLSSp and exacerbated metabolic, cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to ~30 min of exercise at an absolute PO but not at similar relative intensities, whereas increasing the FIO2 by the same amount did not significantly affect MLSSp or physiological responses to exercise performed at the same absolute or relative intensities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207