MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6960104365 · doi:10.13009/ao4elt7-2023-028

The RTC for METIS SCAO

2023· article· en· W6960104365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive opticsWavefrontWavefront sensorSpectrographSoftwareTelescopeDeformable mirrorControl system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mid-infrared ELT Imager and Spectrograph (METIS) is is one of three first-generation science instruments for the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) and has recently completed its final design phase. Its Single Conjugate Adaptive Optics (SCAO) system will provide the performance of an extreme adaptive optics system which enables high contrast imaging observations in the thermal/mid-infrared wavelength domain (3 Im 13.3 Im). The Real-Time Computer (RTC) is the central component of the SCAO real-time control system. It executes the time critical wavefront control loop as well as associated control tasks by processing the data from the pyramid wavefront sensor and controlling the set of ELT actuators dedicated to adaptive optics. A total of up to 4,866 commands to be computed at a loop rate of up to 1 kHz imposes a number of demanding constraints in terms of memory throughput and computing power on the Hard Real-Time Core (HRTC), which employs GPU acceleration for the bulk of computations. Several auxiliary functions need to be in place to establish and maintain the quality of the wavefront correction. Among them are the control of the pupil position, the compensation of misregistration and of non-common path aberration, and the adaptation of the temporal control parameters. The main wavefront control loop has been prototyped to verify timing requirements. A median RTC computation time of 382 Is was achieved for a 300k samples (5 minutes) run. The results are presented in this paper together with the foreseen RTC hardware and the software deployment within the SCAO Control System

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207