MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6961083925 · doi:10.14288/1.0302621

Principles affecting the size of pink and chum salmon populations in British Columbia

2012· article· en· W6961083925 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSex ratioAbundance (ecology)Population densityPopulationFish <Actinopterygii>Density dependenceMortality rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes in population size are governed by the birthrate, the sex ratio and the death rate. In pink salmon the average egg-production per female is about 1700 and variations from this average are insufficient to account for observed changes in adult populations. The sex ratio is approximately 50-50. Survival during the freshwater phases of the life cycle has been found to vary from approximately 1% to 24%,the average survival being significantly different in different streams. Variation is relatively greater in streams in which average survival is low. Natural survival in the ocean is considered, to average about 5% of the number of young fish reaching the sea. In the central region of the British Columbia coast the annual catch averages about 60% of the adult fish, this percentage being relatively constant for both small and large runs. Pink salmon maturing in "even" and "odd" years represent separate populations. These populations vary in size independently but may maintain a relatively constant ratio for a series of generations. This ratio varies from near equality to extreme disparity. Marked changes in the level of abundance may occur suddenly. Three types of mortality are recognized: (a) mortality which becomes relatively heavier as populations increase in density (compensatory) (b) mortality which becomes relatively heavier as populations decrease in density (depensatory) (c) mortality which is independent of density (extrapensatory). (a) is especially identified with the period of spawning and incubation;(b) is considered to occur mainly during the period of fry migration and to be due to predation;(c) may occur at any stage but is probably most variable during the period between entrance of the adults into fresh water and emergence of the fry. Population changes initiated by extrapensatory factors, among which stream-flow conditions are considered to be important, are exaggerated by depensatdry factors (notably predation on fry) but tend to be resisted by the compensatory influences which operate during the period of spawning and incubation. Stabilization of a level of abundance depends on a balance between these processes. In general, freshwater mortality is more variable than ocean mortality and plays a greater part in inducing population changes. It is suggested that the average freshwater survival of an un-fished population would approximate 2.4% and that this efficiency must be raised to about 6% to permit a sustained catch of 60% of the adult population. A lower freshwater output is likely to result in a reduction in size of the stock. Large runs in both even and odd years are not fundamentally incompatible. The possibility, of promoting a low-level stock to a persisting higher level of abundance is indicated. Chum salmon are subject to the same types of mortality as pink salmon but the results are modified by the higher average egg-production (ca.2700) and the variable length of the life cycle. The species tends to occupy streams in which physical conditions are less stable. Compensatory influences are frequently obscured by these conditions, resulting in irregular fluctuations in abundance. In the application of remedial measures similar principles apply to both species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207