MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6961182192 · doi:10.14288/1.0439333

The Great Trek, 1922

2013· other· en· W6961182192 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublicityGovernment (linguistics)DoorsDowntownGovernment OfficeWork (physics)Point (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This video created by the University Archives includes historical photographs and film footage documenting the Great Trek at UBC in 1922. Overcrowded and inadequate facilities at the University of British Columbia's temporary quarters at the Fairview "shacks" prompted students to stage a publicity campaign in 1922 to convince the government to resume construction on its new Point Grey campus. The campaign culminated on October 28, 1922 in what has become known as the Great Trek. The student body of some 1,200 with banners and floats marched through downtown Vancouver and then out to the tip of Point Grey where they climbed into the framework of the unfinished Science building. The public support rallied by the campaign convinced the government to resume work on the Point Grey campus and where UBC opened its doors in 1925. Student organization of the Great Trek and the entire publicity campaign represented a remarkable but not isolated chapter in the University's history. Subsequent student-based initiatives resulted in the construction of the Gymnasium (1929), Brock Hall (1940), Armoury (1941), War Memorial Gymnasium (1951) and the Student Union Building (1968). For more information about the Great Trek see: https://www.library.ubc.ca/archives/trek/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207