MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6961618266 · doi:10.15468/dl.mbue9k

Occurrence Download

2022· dataset· en· W6961618266 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicKantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatching (statistics)DownloadOphiostomaRange (aeronautics)Tree (set theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dataset containing 0 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "TaxonKey is Ophiostoma cupulatum (McNew & T.C.Harr.) Z.W.de Beer & M.J.Wingf.", { "or" : [ "Country is United States", "Country is Canada", "Continent is North America" ] } ] } The dataset includes 0 records from 0 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0126783-210914110416597/datasets/export for details.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1420.207

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biodiversity Information FacilitySame topicKantian Philosophy and Modern InterpretationsFrench-language works237,207