MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962433561 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/bmqz4

Trajectories and Predictors of Women’s Postpartum Genito-pelvic Pain and Sexual Well-being

2021· other· en· W6962433561 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLongitudinal studyPostpartum periodLongitudinal dataPregnancyChartThird trimesterReproductive health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study represents the primary analysis of the project entitled Trajectories and Predictors of Women’s Postpartum Genito-pelvic Pain and Sexual Well-being, conducted by Natalie Rosen (Dalhousie University) in 2014-2020. Women pregnant with their first child (N = 649) were recruited from the IWK Health Centre (Halifax, NS) at their 20-week ultrasound appointment to participate in a longitudinal study that included completing questionnaires at 6 time-points: mid-pregnancy (18-24 weeks), third trimester (32-36 weeks), 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months postpartum. Data on labor and delivery were obtained by chart review. Data have been collected for this study in full.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207