"Savoirs et savoir-faire relatifs aux arts de la scène dans la pratique de la médiation culturelle et numérique des organismes de théâtre, danse et cirque au Québec."
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette réflexion sur les savoirs et les savoir-faire relatifs aux arts de la scène visés par la médiation culturelle et numérique prend appui sur une vaste enquête réalisée dans ce secteur culturel au Québec en 2019 et 2020. L’analyse de ces propos vise à comprendre si la transmission du savoir importe pour ceux et celles qui s’adonnent à la médiation dans les arts de la scène et quels types de savoir sont privilégiés. Finalement, à la lumière des propos que les répondants tiennent sur les actions et les formes de médiation qui se pratiquent dans leur organisme, cette étude examine les tensions qui se font jour entre démocratisation culturelle et démocratie culturelle. Cette étude documente entre autres diverses conceptions de la citoyenneté qui sont identifiables dans les discours analysés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".