MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6962487011 · doi:10.15468/tacbta

Repatriación del material ictiológico de 12 estados de la República Mexicana, depositado en la colección ictiológica de la Universidad de Tulane, E.U.

2011· dataset· es· W6962487011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility · 2011
Typedataset
Languagees
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)LimitingOrder (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Colección Ictiológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas es una de las colecciones más grandes en nuestro país y por su importancia y contenido es una de las Colecciones Nacionales. Es de importancia científica la repatriación de este material, colectado por el Dr. Salvador Contreras Balderas, Dr. Clyde Barbour y W. Sherbrooke, en el año de 1963 en 12 estados de la República Mexicana, el cual comprende los estados de Durango, Zacatecas, Aguascalientes, Jalisco, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Guanajuato, Puebla, Hidalgo, Tamaulipas, Coahuila y Sinaloa, aproximadamente este material serían 3,500 ejemplares en 250 lotes, con la posibilidad de que al revisar su colección, se encuentre otro material de colectas de México. Siendo de importancia científica la gran cantidad de información contenida en él, el cual servirá para su divulgación, en publicaciones posteriores ya que el material de museo es de suma importancia. El material es preservado de acuerdo al método de Hall et al (1962). Se elaborará una base de datos, del material recuperado, mismo que nos servirá para aumentar el acervo de la Colección. La elaboración de un manuscrito Inventario-Taxonómico será el producto final del proyecto.Reino: 1 Filo: 2 Clase: 1 Orden: 9 Familia: 17 Género: 44 Especie: 92

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility→French-language works237,207→