MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962678699 · doi:10.17882/96613

Near-bottom temperature data obtained from Current and Pressure-recording Inverted Echo Sounders (CPIES) and processed HYCOM data near the Chukchi slope

2018· dataset· en· W6962678699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSEANOE · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicBuilding materials and conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Echo (communications protocol)Echo soundingTemporal resolutionAcoustic Doppler current profilerDoppler effectSea surface temperature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quasi-seasonal and sub-inertial variations of near-bottom temperature were observed using Current and Pressure-recording Inverted Echo Sounders (CPIES) deployed on the slope between Canada basin and the Chukchi shelf from August 2018 to July 2020.Quasi-seasonal and sub-inertial variations of near-bottom temperature were observed using Current and Pressure-recording Inverted Echo Sounders (CPIES) deployed on the slope between Canada basin and the Chukchi shelf from August 2018 to July 2020. They were equipped with a 4930R ZPulse Doppler current sensor positioned approximately 51 m above the seafloor, which measured near-bottom current and temperature. Among the variables CPIES measured, we used the near-bottom temperature, the resolution and accuracy of which are 0.01°C and 0.1°C, respectively. We also used temperature, velocity, and sea surface height data from the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM). We collected outputs from the HYCOM + NCODA Global 1/12° GOFS 3.1 41-layer analysis (GLBy0.08 Experiment 93.0). It has a horizontal resolution of 0.08° × 0.04° (zonal and meridional, respectively) and a temporal resolution of 3 h.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSEANOESame topicBuilding materials and conservationFrench-language works237,207