Pacific salmon and farmed salmon on the Pacific coast of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstracts are to be cited without prior reference to the author.The relationship between Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) and farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) remains as one of the most contentious issues in the history of the management of Pacific salmon in British Columbia. The issue is fuelled by a decrease in the commercial catch of Pacific salmon and escalating production of farmed salmon. In 2008, for example, the annual production of farmed salmon was about ten times larger than the commercial catch of Pacific salmon (Figure 1). Salmon farming is controversial for scientific reasons and in some cases for ideological reasons. In British Columbia, one major concern is the effect that sea lice produced on farmed salmon have on wild Pacific salmon. British Columbians use the health of Pacific salmon as a measure of their quality of life. Anything that threatens Pacific salmon makes many people uncomfortable. Thus, in 2002, when there was an unexpected poor return of pink salmon (O. gorbuscha) in an area of intensive fish farming, the issues relating to salmon farming became a public concern
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.109 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".