MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962760600 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/wty6k

Comparison and Validation of E-Cigarette Dependence Measures

2021· other· en· W6962760600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvergent validityConcurrent validityInternal consistencyScale (ratio)Measure (data warehouse)Test validityExternal validityPredictive validity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study will assess the convergent validity between the E-cigarette Dependence Scale (EDS, formerly PROMIS-E), the Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PS-ECDI), and a self-reported measure of e-cigarette dependence among a cohort of 3000 Canadian youth aged 16-24. In addition, the concurrent validity and internal consistency (where applicable) of each of the three measures will also be assessed. The aim of this study is to establish these measures as having high concurrent and convergent validity for measuring e-cigarette dependence in youth, thus deeming them appropriate measures for use in future studies of e-cigarette dependence in adolescent and young-adult cohorts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkSame topicSmoking Behavior and CessationFrench-language works237,207